Saltar al contento

Discussion Usator:McDutchie

Le contento del pagina non es supportate in altere linguas.
Adder topico
De Wikipedia, le encyclopedia libere
Ultime commento: 1 mense retro per YariDarling in topico Pagina de discussion
Pagina pro discussion concernente mi editiones in Wikipedia in Interlingua. Clicca super “Modificar iste pagina” e insere vostre commentos. Respecta per favor lo scribite per alteres.

Ubi poner questiones technic?

[modificar fonte]

Salute, io ama le nove aspecto. Sape tu ubi es le correcte loco pro demandar questiones technic o general? Io ha plure! Usator:Jmb

Io non lo sape, de facto. Il es Jay Bowks (ILVI) qui ha initiate iste wiki, tu pote tentar inviar le un message. Il anque ha le pagina Wikipedia:Reportos de disfunctiones ubi tu pote lassar messages super cosas que non functiona ben. — Martijn

Mailing-list

[modificar fonte]

Salve McDutchie,

Nos nunc ha un mailing-list in interlingua pro parlar del subjectos de wikipedia, io te invita a inscriber te hic: http://www.coollist.com/group.cgi?l=wikipedia_interlingua

JoSoares 20:45 jan 8, 2004 (UTC)

Bellissimo! Io me ha inscribite. Io nota que alcun texto in le pagina de inscription non es ancora traducite del italiano. Tamben, "mailing-list" pote traducer se per "lista de distribution" o "de diffusion", e "password" es "contrasigno". – Martijn 21:03 jan 8, 2004 (UTC)

Salut!

[modificar fonte]

Salut! Mantene tu laboras bon! Equalmente , certo io va meliorar mi nivello de interlingua. Si ille vos place, adjuta me in mi obras de lingua macaroni (articulos de un mixtion de interlingua, espaniol e ingles o interlingua mal grado). Sed ecce necessita multo articulos!--Jondel 00:16, 2 februario 2006 (UTC)Responder

Non sapeva que tu sia McDutchie! Itaque tu es Martinj McDutchie? Gratias per tus consilios de grammatica. De tote modo, continua tu laboras bon!--Jondel 02:57, 2 februario 2006 (UTC)Responder

Welcome

[modificar fonte]

Hi. Do you can welcome me (using a template)? Just a esthetical topic. Sorry for my poor english. --Slade 20:47, 3 maio 2006 (UTC)Responder

OK. Benvenite alora :-)
Martijn 18:14, 26 maio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Administrator

[modificar fonte]

Io ha nominate tu pro le posto de administrator hic. -- Dissident (Discussion) 17:46, 26 maio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Multe gratias! -- Martijn 18:10, 26 maio 2006 (UTC)Responder
Jondel etiam vole devenir administrator. Forsan tu pote emitter un opinion super lo. -- Dissident (Discussion) 22:02, 26 maio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Bureaucraat

[modificar fonte]

Beste Martijn, zie Wikipedia:Administratores#Bureaucrat. Zou je mij willen steunen bureaucraat te worden op IA.wiki? Op dit moment zitten we zonder actieve bureaucraat. Groetjes, Jcb 21:00, 5 junio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Moderator

[modificar fonte]

Beste Martijn, ik heb een verzoek op meta achtergelaten om jou moderator te maken. Zolang we geen actieve bureaucraat hebben moeten de stewards dit voor ons doen. Groetjes, Jcb 22:16, 9 junio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Salute, McDutchie, io me gaude de ser hic e salutar te anque hic. Gratias pro tu message a me hic, qui es un nove usator e redactor futur (sperabilemente diligente... :-) ) de Wikipedia.

Shoshoj

Multo belle frontispicio

[modificar fonte]

Car McDutchie,

Le nove Frontispicio es multo belle

Josu Lavin

Template

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie,

Sci tu como crear un template pro le taxonomia? Actualmente, io crea un tabula per cata pagina biologic (como in orangutan e banana), sed iste methoda non me sembla un methoda bon. Gratias!

--vaftrudner 11:19, 30 junio 2006 (UTC)Responder

alfil/episcopo

[modificar fonte]

le parolas pro le pecia de chacos in espaniol, italiano, e francese es "alfil", "alfiere" (insignia), e "fou" (buffon) respectivemente e totes es derivate del arabe "alfil" (le elephante). -- Dissident (Discussion) 09:40, 3 julio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Le etymologia de "fou" que tu da es del original senso e non es del pecia de chacos. Iste es generalmente acceptate esser un corruption de "alfil". Si tu pote trovar contrari evidentia, io audira lo de bon voluntate. Quanto a tu secunde puncto, applicar notiones subjective in le etymologia de parolas de interlingua como "comprensibilitate" sin objective mesuras deberea esser reducite al minimo. Io opina que "episcopo" es nimis anglocentric e indige plus significante appoio que portugese. -- Dissident (Discussion) 12:42, 3 julio 2006 (UTC)Responder

Latino moderne

[modificar fonte]

Gratias pro vostre responsa a mi comencio de debato sure le secunde lingua de tote le locutores neo-latin. Io mesme debutat per le interlingua classic, ma in este tempo me fu totalmente impossibile obtener le plus minime subsidio del organisationes del U.E. (o oltre) al promotion de vostre lingua. E quando io ha decidite suprimer le vocabulos antique non clar (cf. "nimis", "iste", "indige"... in le paragrafo supra), simplificar le formas e fonetisar le ortografia, nos ha recepte in breve tempo plus que 7 000 euros de diverse auxilios : assi se vee esso qui place lo plus (o, plus exacto, esso qui se comprende lo plus e sen estudio). Un puncto comun, nonobstante, al interlingua e a su dialecto pro le 900 miliones de neo-latinos : le jornalistas de nivel national non se interessa a nostre lingua(s). De la, le anonimato in-que nos deve ancora viver... facto qui satisface plenmente le anglese e su servientes docile. Ma io resta al disposition del interlinguistas (averte) pro qualcunque colaboration inter nos...

                                            alexandre.rousset@free.fr


Please note that this article Latino moderne has been erased from fr:, because it was not notable. Its author is trying to use Wikipedia to promote his language. Regards

Gratias

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie! Gratias per tu message de benvenita. Julian Mendez 14:43, 12 novembre 2006 (UTC)Responder

Translation

[modificar fonte]

I've just noticed the translation you have performed on my personal page. What a nice gesture! I was planning on trying to do it, but you made my job easy. :-) Thanks -- Robin des Bois ♘ 01:11, 23 novembre 2006 (UTC)Responder

Kernel

[modificar fonte]

Vidente le nomines del articulos in altere wikipedias (anglese, italiano e portugese), io constata que il ha sufficiente supporto pro "kernel" como parola del interlingua. -- Dissident (Discussion) 00:26, 13 decembre 2006 (UTC)Responder

Bon anno nove

[modificar fonte]

Salute Martijn. Bon anno nove 2007. Cordialmente, Julian Mendez 19:02, 30 decembre 2006 (UTC)Responder

Deletion rapide

[modificar fonte]

Salute Martijn! Mi excusas, io facera lo. Cordialmente, Julian Mendez 23:02, 6 januario 2007 (UTC)Responder

Patronos

[modificar fonte]

Salute Martijn! Gratias pro le patrono de benvenite - patrono ben fabricate! Tu sape si es utile a crear nove patronos sin permission? Io volerea crear nove unes noves pro cosas geographic e renova renovar unes [les; alcunes] que ja existe. Notscott 23:32, 7 januario 2007 (UTC) [Corrigite per Martijn 10:01, 10 januario 2007 (UTC)]Responder

Benvenite

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie

Si e mi contributiones

Gratias Adailton 15:09, 15 januario 2007 (UTC)Responder

Deletions

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie, Quando io face un 'requesta de deletion rapide' con Patrono:Eliminar, il ha un persona specific que les elimina, o alcun administrator? Il ha un methodo melior? Notscott 02:23, 12 februario 2007 (UTC)Responder

Geometria

[modificar fonte]

Salute, McDutchie! Mi nomine es André Oliva. Io parla espaniol, ma io es apprendente Interlingua, gratias al sito de le Union Mundial Pro Interlingua in Internet. Io sape que io ha multe errores quando scribe in Interlingua, ma io creava le articulo Geometria. Quando vos revideva le articulo, illo esseva in stato embryonic. Ora, iste articulo es plus grande. Pote vos revider novemente le articulo? Multe gratias. --André Oliva 00:20, 21 februario 2007 (UTC)Responder

Thanks

[modificar fonte]
File:Interlingual Barnstar.png
Thanks for translating my user page! Jon Harald Søby 16:52, 12 martio 2007 (UTC)Responder

Category:Systems on English Wikipedia

[modificar fonte]

Thank you for your contribution to the systems category. Please note that for en:Category:Systems on the English Wikipedia, there is currently a Call for Deletion. If you would like to contribute to the discussion, you would be very welcome. In particular, if you would like to save this category, please add a Keep entry with your "signature" using "~~~~". Please do this soon if possible since the discussion period is very short. Thank you for your interest if you can contribute. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 65.32.254.73 18:52, 13 april 2007 (UTC)Responder

Un video in Interlingua

[modificar fonte]

Salute! Io creava un video del un del .ogg files que vos creava in 2007 e le poneva a YouTube. Io spera que vos lo amara:

http://mithridates.blogspot.com/2008/06/audio-file-of-guerra-war-in-interlingua.html

Io intende crear files pro YouTube del alteres anque. Io pensa que vostre pronunciation es multo bon e servi ben pro monstrar le pronunciation ideal del lingua.

Mithridates 16:16, 14 junio 2008 (UTC)Responder

Revision linguistic

[modificar fonte]

Gratias pro le revision linguistic de WP:5P, WP:VF, WP:NONES, {{benvenite}} e alteres! —André. 17:43, 14 julio 2008 (UTC)Responder

Que pensa tu de isto nove portal de cursos?

[modificar fonte]

Car Martijn,

Io ha create un portal de cursos de interlingua e io sape que tu cognosce le vocabulario scientific e pro computatores in interlingua. Pote tu adjutar con ideas? Pote tu adjutar con un revision? Plus importante es que isto portal de cursos es utile pro novicios. Nos pote crear un comunitate forte. Que pensa tu? -- Gratias, Architengi 21:02, 9 martio 2009 (UTC)Responder

Gramatica in romaniano

[modificar fonte]

Salute, Martin (McDutchie)

Io es gaude de trovar que tu pensa de crear un articulo super le lingua romaniano? Io pote adjutar te con isto projecto. Isto es un exemplo de gramatica in lingua romanian:

Person Infinitivo Presente Pasato Futuro
Regula infinitivo presente haber(conj) + participio va(conj) + infinitivo
Eu/Io a dansa dansez am dansat voi dansa
Tu dansezi ai dansat vei dansa
El/Ea danseaza a dansat va dansa
Noi dansam am dansat vom dansa
Voi dansati ati dansat veti dansa
Ei/Ele danseaza au dansat vor dansa
Person Infinitivo Presente Pasato Futuro
Regula infinitivo presente haber(conj) + participio va(conj) + infinitivo
Eu/Io a canta cant am cantat voi canta
Tu canti ai cantat vei canta
El/Ea canta a cantat va canta
Noi cantam am cantat vom canta
Voi cantati ati cantat veti canta
Ei/Ele canta au cantat vor canta
Person Infinitivo Presente Pasato Futuro
Regula infinitivo presente haber(conj) + participio va(conj) + infinitivo
Eu/Io a auzi aud am auzit voi auzi
Tu auzi ai auzit vei auzi
El/Ea aude a auzit va auzi
Noi auzim am auzit vom auzi
Voi auziti ati auzit veti auzi
Ei/Ele aud au auzit vor auzi

Si isto es utile a te, pro favor scribe a me.

Gratias, Mushi 20:56, 23 novembre 2009 (UTC)Responder

Thank you for your kind welcome! Mushi 19:45, 26 novembre 2009 (UTC)Responder

Gratias

[modificar fonte]

Thank you for your answer http://ia.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discussion_Wikipedia:Portal_del_communitate#Interlingua I also made some comments :) Mushi 18:45, 27 novembre 2009 (UTC)Responder

Derivar parolas basate in un mesme radice

[modificar fonte]

Inspired by your comment, I created a table for romanian words and their root:

"Lor origine, composition e connexiones familial ha essite obscurate: il generalmente non es possibile derivar un parola regularmente del altere como in interlingua
'integr-e', 'dis-integr-ar', 'integr-itate', 're-integr-abile', etc.
– totes basate in un mesme radice.

This is the table I came up with. What is your opinion, is this useful in any way? Can something like this fit in the [[Lingua romanian]] article, or can we have something like this for interlingua article as well (of course with the interlingua words instead of romanian words)? Do we have an article '''Interlingua-English comparison''' where we can underline the fact that in Interlingua the words are derived but in English "il generalmente non es possibile derivar un parola del altere como in interlingua"? :-)

Lng Substantivo Infinitivo Participio Subst. derivate Maestro del action Habilitate de action Habilitate de action repetative Infinitivo opposite
IA integr-e integr-ar integr-ate integr-itate integr-ator integr-abile re-integr-abile dis-integr-ar
EN integer to integr-ate integr-ated integr-itate integr-ator integr-abile re-integr-abile to des-integr-ate
RO intreg a integr-a integr-at integr-itate integr-ator integr-abil re-integr-abil a dez-integr-a
RO aspirare a aspira aspir-at aspir-atie aspir-ator aspir-abil re-aspir-abil a dez-aspir-a
RO loc a locu-i locu-it loc-atie locu-itor locu-ibil re-locu-ibil a dez-locui
RO cant/cantec a cant-a cant-at cant-are cant-ator cant-abil re-cant-abil a dez-canta
RO vizita a vizit-a vizit-at vizit-are vizit-ator vizit-abil re-vizit-abil a dez-vizita
RO construire a constru-i constru-it constru-ctie constru-ctor constru-ibil re-constru-ibil a demola (dezconstrui)
RO fapt a face fac-ut fac-ere fac-ator fac-ubil re-fac-ubil a des-face
RO profesare a profes-a profes-at profes-are profes-or profes-abil re-profes-abil a dez-profesa
RO imbracaminte a imbrac-a imbrac-at imbrac-are imbrac-ator imbrac-abil re-imbrac-abil a dez-braca
RO fabrica a fabric-a fabric-at fabric-atie fabric-ator fabric-abil re-fabric-abil a dez-fabrica
RO inspirare a inspir-a inspir-at inspir-atie inspir-ator inspir-abil re-inspir-abil a dez-inspira

Please let me know what do you think. :) Mushi 00:32, 4 decembre 2009 (UTC)Responder

Santiago ruiz

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie

Que le sembla Santiago ruiz ?

Gratias Adailton msg 20:00, 4 april 2010 (UTC)Responder

Requestas de elimination rapide

[modificar fonte]

Salute Martijn

Mi intendimento es que le administrator debe verificar le historia del articulo ante deler le articulo, perque mesmo usator experiente pote committer equivoc. Ma, per su demanda, altete (altiente?) mie monobook.

Gratias Adailton msg 09:23, 20 maio 2010 (UTC)Responder


Salute Martijn!

Le articulo de Zamenhof forsan e excellente ma io dubita si il es apte haber un tal articulo sur le pagina initial. Isto probabilemente fortifica le impression que interlingua es un forma de esperanto lo que nos troppo sovente debe denegar. Torrente

Felice die de interlingua

[modificar fonte]

Salute Martijn!

Felice die de interlingua!

Io spera que nos pote incontrar nos personalmente in le futuro (non distante).

Amicalmente, --Julian (disc.) 09:48, 15 januario 2011 (UTC)Responder

Scribi a te in Facebook

[modificar fonte]

Hello Martijn, Pedi a te amicos in facebook.Te ave legido la meva solisittata?.Scusati qi io srivo in dialecto (DEIS),se entende no?.Salutis--Neosofista 13:47, 13 augusto 2011 (UTC)Responder


Help

[modificar fonte]

Please, could you help me here? I don't speak Interlingua and there's nobody else writing here. --Chabi 05:45, 13 septembre 2011 (UTC)Responder

Article translation/collaboration request

[modificar fonte]

Hi McDutchie, how are you? Mate, I am trying to find an editor/s who can help by translating User:Russavia/Polandball into Interlingua. I was wondering if we could make a trade?

If you could translate that article into Interlingua for me, I would be happy to upload approximately 50 aviation photos to Commons from amongst the 200,000 I have permission to upload. I have uploaded a number of photos to give you a brief idea of what I can upload, and I am keeping a gallery at User:Russavia of photos uploaded.

Would you be interested in such a collaborative "trade"? Do let me know, either by responding here, or on my talk page, or by emailing me. Cheers, Russavia (discussion) 14:14, 9 augusto 2012 (UTC)Responder

en:translatewiki.net

[modificar fonte]

Hello McDutchie, would you mind translating the article on this wiki, if allowed here? (It should have enough reliable sources, I hope.) --Nemo bis (discussion) 21:15, 30 april 2013 (UTC)Responder

Hjalmar Söderberg

[modificar fonte]

Salute McDutchie

Please check editing in Hjalmar Söderberg. I undid the edition by assuming vandalism, but not sure.

Thanks 187.112.67.96 20:07, 13 decembre 2013 (UTC)Responder

Gratias. Io cognosce le autor de iste modification. Il non tractava de vandalismo, ma de un referentia al traduction in interlingua de iste libro. Io lo ha re-inserite in forma de un nota al pede. – Martijn (discussion) 07:12, 10 januario 2014 (UTC)Responder

Salute McDutchie

Please check editing Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva. I ask for page protection (temporary) to prevent further vandalism.

Amicalmente 200.201.164.17 15:43, 27 junio 2014 (UTC)Responder

[modificar fonte]

Hi. Can you please Patrono:Link GA the same say ou deleted Link FA so that we finish the task? Thanks, Magioladitis (discussion) 13:46, 22 april 2015 (UTC)Responder

OK, done. – 00:25, 25 april 2015 (UTC)

Range Block

[modificar fonte]

Hi. Could you explain why you made a large number of ip range blocks? There is a bit 'too much this measure could backfire given the high number of blocked ip. Also it would be better to open a discussion to decide what to do instead proceed independently? Thanks and regards. --Samuele2002 (discussion) 17:47, 17 april 2017 (UTC)Responder

It's the only way to keep Tobias Conradi's "anonymous" vandalism out; he uses an ISP with dynamically assigned addresses so they will change each time he reconnects, which he can (and does) trivially use to circumvent a single-IP ban. I verified with whois that these ranges all belong to the same ISP which he uses. Note that these IPs are not blocked for editing from registered accounts.
Regarding your second question, the behaviour exhibited by these IPs is consistent with Tobias Conradi and he started harassing me on Facebook under his own name in response to my attempts to undo some of the damage he was doing, so my identification of him is positive. He was blocked globally and forever in November 2015, and the global community has asked everyone to help enforce his ban. The community discussion you ask for has well and truly taken place, on a global Wikimedia Foundation level. – Martijn (discussion) 18:08, 17 april 2017 (UTC)Responder

And why can IP that is not blocked write at Usator:Samuele2002 but not Usator:FritzVonHomburg? And why is the Taverna blocked for ALL IPs? And where is the vandalism? 92.227.230.221 18:28, 17 april 2017 (UTC)Responder

Oh look, another Telefonica Germany IP address. Hi again Tobias Conradi. The vandalism you left here contains messages identical to the ones you addressed to me under your own name in Facebook. Looks like another range block is needed. You have been banned globally on all Wikipedias since November 2015. Your participation here is not welcome. GO AWAY.Martijn (discussion) 19:45, 17 april 2017 (UTC)Responder
Look Ip guy, your behaviour is very brusque. All communities 'need' and mutual trust and respect to function. Administrators have the right to block and many of you were blocked not surprisingly. I mentioned I was lenient compared to other admins. I'm sure if you do the same thing in a different wiki the reaction would be the same, no different. Your protest are excessive aimed at forcing the issue. You keep forcing the issue and they/we/I are just going to respond in kind. Kindly work with us not against us.--Jondel (discussion) 19:13, 17 april 2017 (UTC)Responder
Conradi edita nunc como 213.39.161.219 (Telefonica Germany GmbH) Ille systmaticament disface tu modificationes recente.—Tortoise0308 (discussion) 18:28, 26 april 2017 (UTC)Responder
Gratias pro le alerta! – Martijn (discussion) 18:35, 26 april 2017 (UTC)Responder
Conradi edita nunc como 92.229.164.1. Vide Taverna—Tortoise0308 (discussion) 18:18, 30 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder
Gratias! Blocate e revertite. – Martijn (discussion) 18:24, 30 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder

Contributiones e correctiones

[modificar fonte]

Pardona me o McDutchie si il vos place pro mi faltas in interlingua. Nonobstante io te exprimo gratias pro tuo correctiones e contributiones cum patrones et alteras recente. --Jondel (discussion) 02:46, 15 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder

Request for undeletion

[modificar fonte]

Please restore the article on the Disney film Beauty and the Beast which exists at en:Beauty and the Beast (1991 film), a stub can be created using the old content. 72.173.166.93 21:33, 24 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder

Facite. – Martijn (discussion) 21:42, 24 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder

The article should probably be renamed Beauty and the Beast (film de 1991) like the original article, because en:Beauty and the Beast is about the en:fairly tale. 72.173.166.93 22:46, 24 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder

Io non pensa que isto es necessari; le conto de fees haberea un titulo in interlingua, non in anglese. – Martijn (discussion) 22:58, 24 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder
There is also a 2017 film, plus a few others, such as the 1946 film. Also, last year Usator:Julius Tominius (a sockpuppet of Usator:Tobias Conradi) moved Charlotte's Web to Charlotte's Web (libro), even though most Wikipedia have the novel as the primary topic of the article. Finally, there's the fact that the article Happy Tree Friends looks like spam. 72.173.166.93 07:03, 29 maio 2017 (UTC)Responder
Could you expand Liv and Maddie and Charlotte's Web based on this edit and this edit? Better yet, Liv and Maddie could be based on this edit in English and Charlotte's Web could be based on this edit. Or maybe merge the two articles? After all, the Dutch versions of these articles are smaller than the English ones. Could you expand them in Dutch too perhaps? 2602:306:83A9:3D00:80A0:A1A8:F6A6:BBBA 11:48, 1 junio 2017 (UTC)Responder

Blamed

[modificar fonte]

Hello! I'm an user of Portuguese Wikipedia, and I'd like to make a quick deletion of my User page in this Wiki. Could you help me? What template should I use? Blamed (discussion) 20:58, 6 octobre 2017 (UTC)Responder

OK Iste requesta suffice. Io ha delite tu pagina de usator. - Martijn (discussion) 21:22, 6 octobre 2017 (UTC)Responder

Dubita

[modificar fonte]

Holla. Io ha tentate crear un articulo, ma un error a dicer que mi edition habeva pauc parolas ha me impedite. Io voleva saper quante parolas al minime es necessari per evitar iste error e/o si le facto de mi conto non ha essite confirmate ha alcun cosa con iste problema. Gratias. — Le precedente commento non signate esseva addite per Matheuslollidc (discussion) a 07:59, 12 april 2018‎ (UTC)Responder

Io ha inserite mi responsa in tu pagina de discussion. Amicalmente – Martijn (discussion) 13:18, 12 april 2018 (UTC)Responder

2019 Brazil wildfires

[modificar fonte]

Hello again McDutchie, how are you going?

Since last year you had the nice gesture to help with the translation of the Communicato sur le Museo National, you would want to help with this new crises? As you may know, is happening several wildfires in Brazil and South America and today we started an article on that. You want/have time to (at least start) translate the article 2019 Brazil wildfires into ia/nl? Thanks, Erick Soares3 (discussion) 19:50, 22 augusto 2019 (UTC)Responder

How we will see unregistered users

[modificar fonte]

Hi!

You get this message because you are an admin on a Wikimedia wiki.

When someone edits a Wikimedia wiki without being logged in today, we show their IP address. As you may already know, we will not be able to do this in the future. This is a decision by the Wikimedia Foundation Legal department, because norms and regulations for privacy online have changed.

Instead of the IP we will show a masked identity. You as an admin will still be able to access the IP. There will also be a new user right for those who need to see the full IPs of unregistered users to fight vandalism, harassment and spam without being admins. Patrollers will also see part of the IP even without this user right. We are also working on better tools to help.

If you have not seen it before, you can read more on Meta. If you want to make sure you don’t miss technical changes on the Wikimedia wikis, you can subscribe to the weekly technical newsletter.

We have two suggested ways this identity could work. We would appreciate your feedback on which way you think would work best for you and your wiki, now and in the future. You can let us know on the talk page. You can write in your language. The suggestions were posted in October and we will decide after 17 January.

Thank you. /Johan (WMF)

18:15, 4 januario 2022 (UTC)

Articulo eminente

[modificar fonte]

Io ha proposte iste articulo como un articulo eminente. An tu poterea per favor votar pro illo? --Caro de Segeda (discussion) 16:22, 18 april 2023 (UTC)Responder

Revision

[modificar fonte]

Hallo, como va tu? Io volerea demandar te si tu poterea possibilemente revisar iste articulo que io ha traducite in Interlingua. Un vice que illo es revisate, io va adder le referentias e presentar lo pro esser seligite como un articulo destacate in nostre Wikipedia. Caro de Segeda (discussion) 09:41, 8 julio 2025 (UTC)Responder

An tu poterea adjutar me con le revision del articulos re chimia e physica? --Caro de Segeda (discussion) 20:10, 17 julio 2025 (UTC)Responder

Request

[modificar fonte]

Could you please expand the article I wrote on Encanto? I personally love this film. It's a beautiful tribute to Colombian culture. I couldn't have asked for a better film. It's the best film I've seen since The Lion King (film de 1994). 2600:1700:C910:2960:19F1:9DA6:2860:2F19 21:56, 23 julio 2025 (UTC)Responder

✅ Facite (in julio). Martijn (discussion) 18:17, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Nos Son Nostre Montanias

[modificar fonte]

Hello.

In the article Nos Son Nostre Montanias, can you add current-day information post-2023 about this monument? According to reports, the monument has been vandalized and its surroundings also have been damaged. Damage in the front and in the back of the monument is clearly visible in the photos and videos. According to reports, the Azerbaijani government is considering demolishing the monument.

This has been added in en:We Are Our Mountains.

Yours sincerely, 78.174.55.43 09:01, 27 augusto 2025 (UTC)Responder

Hello, McDutchie.
Can you update this article?
Yours sincerely, ~2025-29656-62 (discussion) 17:13, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder
✅ Facite. Martijn (discussion) 18:15, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder
Thank you very much. ~2025-29656-62 (discussion) 18:26, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder

New article request

[modificar fonte]

Hello, McDutchie.

Can you create the article Haluk Bilginer in Interlingua Wikipedia? I tried to create the article, but it was blocked by a filter.

Yours sincerely, ~2025-29656-62 (discussion) 17:15, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder

{infobox}
 '''Nihat Haluk Bilginer''' (nascite le [[5 de junio]] [[1954]]) es un [[actor]] [[Turchia|turc]]. 

== Ligamines externe ==
 {{Commons}}
 * {{IMDb nomine}} {{en}} 

{{DEFAULTSORT:Bilginer, Haluk}}
 [[:Categoria:Gente turc]]
 [[:Categoria:Actores de film]]
 [[:Categoria:Actores de theatro]]
 {{pecietta|biographia|actor}}

~2025-29656-62 (discussion) 17:15, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder

✅ Facite. Martijn (discussion) 17:54, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder
Thank you very much. ~2025-29656-62 (discussion) 18:26, 21 octobre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Neologismos

[modificar fonte]

Per favor, Martijn, evita reverter tote le labor que on ha facite in le section "informatica". Le parolas seligite son fructo de longe horas de labor conjuncte con altere interlinguistas! Le uso de anglese es e debe ser ALTERNATIVE al uso de parolas neolatin. Nostre labor sur articulos como machinario o programmario (e su typos, i.e. programmario redemptive, programmario firme, programmario spia etc.) e altere traductiones que nos ha attentemente seligite, merita respecto e attention. Si tu vole cambiar un labor jam facte, per favor scribe lo in le pagina de discussion e parla de isto con me e con le alie collaboratores del gruppo. YariDarling (discussion) 02:03, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Interlingua es un lingua international e su vocabulario es definite per lo que es de facto international, e non per alcun preferentias personal.
Le neologismos in question es inventiones personal vostre, necuno altere los usa, illos non appare in alcun dictionario, illos non es appoiate per alcun lingua de origine, illos non es interlingua e illos non conveni sur iste encyclopedia, que debe monstrar interlingua correcte al publico. Isto non es negotiabile. Martijn (discussion) 02:08, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Reversion

[modificar fonte]

Martijn, per favor, cessa reverter nostre labor! Scribe a me, adde tu suggestiones in le pagina de discussion, o parla sur le gruppos "Interlingua" o "Traduction in Interlingua" con le altere usatores! Respecta nostre labor.

Gratias YariDarling (discussion) 02:08, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Vide mi altere responsa sur interlingua correcte.
Si tu non accepta que tu contributiones pote esser modificate, corrigite, extendite e mesmo reimplaciate per alteres, alora Wikipedia non es le loco apte pro tu contributiones. Como dice le aviso official: “Si tu non vole que tu scripto sia modificate impietosemente e redistribuite a voluntate, alora non submitte lo hic”. Martijn (discussion) 02:15, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder
Le pagina de discussion existe pro un motivation. Io te contactara in privato pro discuter de isto. YariDarling (discussion) 02:33, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Pagina de discussion

[modificar fonte]

Martijn, io cercava tu eposta ma al momento non lo trova. Io lo demandara a Thomas. On debe absolutemente discuter privatemente de isto, ante que tu continua reverter nostre labor. Si le parola programmario non te place, usa programma o altere versiones neolatin in interlingua, ma super toto, scribe lo in le pagina de discussion, assi que le pauc personas que labora a iste lingua non fuge via trovante se lor labor subito cancellate. Le uso massive que tu face del anglese annulla le motivo pro quem nos usa interlingua. Dunque on pote trovar solutiones insimul assi que omnes pote haber un alternativa neolatin al parola anglese, que es le scopo de iste projecto: parlar internationalmente con vocabulario latin.

Gratias, io te contacta tosto. YariDarling (discussion) 02:29, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder

Amico, io non ha revertite o cancellate alcun cosa, io ha corrigite terminologia que non es valide in interlingua de IALA (isto es un facto verificabile e non un question de lo que me place o non) e facite altere modificationes que es totalmente normal pro Wikipedia.
Es tu qui ha revertite, tres vices usque ora, mi correctiones legitime in lo que ha devenite un guerra de modificationes. Per favor cessa, ante que io me trova fortiate a prender mesuras como le protection del paginas in question e/o le blocage de tu conto.
Iste encyclopedia es in interlingua e debe esser in bon interlingua. Si un parola necessari non se trova in le dictionarios, es essential sequer le normas establite del derivation de parolas in interlingua. Iste principio fundamental es le base de tote le lingua. Wikipedia non es un vehiculo pro promover agendas personal de reformation de interlingua.
No, io non vole entrar in un discussion private. Martijn (discussion) 03:02, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder
Amico, le evolution del lingua es normal e desiderabile, e le uso de calcos linguistic e derivationes intelligente rende le lingua vive e active: super toto un lingua tan pauc usate como interlingua.
De tote maniera, obviemente tu pote modificar le articulos e multe vices mi articulos ha site modificate, ma in iste caso tu ha cambiate completemente tote un thesauro informatic usate in varie articulos, assi que io te renova que on pote discuter del utilisation de un termino (como programma) o de un catena de parolas in un vocabulario specific (como redemptive, malitiose etc.) in le pagina de discussion del articulo quando usatores contribuente te lo demanda specificamente. Le discussion in wikipedia serve a trovar insimul le solution melior al bon resultato del articulo.
Tu tono in le message es fortemente inamical pro appellar me "amico", e tu menacia de blocar mi profilo post multe annos de interlingua, e decenas de articulos de Wikipedia create o corrigite o ampliate, io lo trova vermente de fede gusto. Io non crede certo meritar me de esser exiliate de Wikipedia pro haber volite contribuer al expansion e al utilisation de interlingua anque hic.
Io ha dicite de parlar per eposta proque in le parve mundo de interlingua on es in un circulo multo restricte de personas, e il es ben mantener relationes human e normal, e anque saper qui parla al altere latere del schermo.
Il me displace multo vider que tu non vole parlar me in privato, non obstante mi labor prolifere in nostre projecto linguistic commun. Io spera que tu tono sia debite al hora nocturne e al natura del messages in rete, e non a un modo inamical de tractar le altere interlinguistas voluntari que vole contactar te pro conversar re le projecto ipse. Io te ha solmente pricate de discuter inter nos ante continuar un reversion unilateral de multe articulos correlate in le argumento Informatica, a quem nos ha laborate con dedition.
Io spera vider te in un proxime reunion virtual de interlinguistas, assi que on potera parlar normalmente como duo personas.
A tosto YariDarling (discussion) 03:38, 2 novembre 2025 (UTC)Responder