Wikipedia:Taverna

De Wikipedia, le encyclopedia libere
Saltar a: navigation, cercar
Pagina principal | Projecto:Wikipedia in interlingua | 2016-07-31 | Taverna
Spatios: Special · Articulo  · Usator · Projecto · File · MediaWiki · Patrono · Categoria · Appendice · Module · Gadget
In le pagina del Taverna tu pote lassar messages al usatores de Wikipedia in interlingua. Archivos: Special:Indice de prefixos/Wikipedia:Taverna/

Bot Bienvenido.png     Requestas de bots.

Crystal Clear app lists.png     Activitates proponite in le Taverna.

Contento

Wikipedia 15[modificar fonte]

Le 15 de januario 2016 Wikipedia ha su 15te anniversario. Vos omnes es invitate a participar in le activitates de celebration. Plus information in Wikipedia 15.

In addition, io volerea adder iste information al pagina principal, si vos non es contrari. Il me sembla importante dar visibilitate a iste typo de activitates. --Julian (disc.) 23:56, 5 januario 2016 (UTC)

"Films" o "filmes"[modificar fonte]

Io ha remarcate que alicunes articulos e categorias utilisa "films" (Categoria:Films de Disney, Categoria:Films per genere...) e alicunes utilisa "filmes" (Categoria:Filmes del Statos Unite, Cinema...). Qual forma es correcte? Io credeva que "filmes" es correcte, mais io vide que multe categorias utilisa "films". Vanquissh (discussion) 20:59, 6 januario 2016 (UTC)

Salute! Io cita le Grammatica de interlingua:
"§25
Le PLURAL es formate per le addition de -s o – post un consonante – de -es. Un -c final cambia ante -es a -ch; p.ex.
...
uxor -> uxores
...
Plurales irregular occurre solmente in "vocabulos hospite" le quales ha retenite lor identitate estranier.
...
le test -> le tests (Anglese)
"
Si on vide le Interlingua-English Dictionary, le parola test esseva prendite como vocabulo hospite del anglese, e analogemente le parola film.
Io pensa que le plural de "film" es "films".
Cordialmente, --Julian (disc.) 22:34, 6 januario 2016 (UTC)
Post un consonante le plural se face con -es, "Filmes" es le sol plural correcte de film. --Flag of Santiago de Cali.svg Remux - Io nunquam oblidara que io me inamorava del plus belle flor Ĉu mi povas helpi vin en io?Esperanto star.png 00:19, 7 januario 2016 (UTC)
Gratias, Julian e Remux. Vanquissh (discussion) 20:11, 9 januario 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia 15 e Die de interlingua[modificar fonte]

instantia de Wikidata WD% WP-ia statistic WP-ia% WP-ia infobox WP-ia categoria
(total) 15 800 000 100% 15 033 100% - -
persona ~2 900 000 18% 824 5.5% Patrono:Infobox/typo/persona Categoria:Persona
entitate territorial administrative ~2 000 000 12% 8 868 59% Patrono:Infobox/typo/entitate territorial administrative Categoria:Entitate territorial administrative
taxon ~2 000 000 12% 248 1.6% Patrono:Infobox/typo/taxon Categoria:Taxon

Le tres infoboxes monstra datos directamente de Wikidata, solo necessita scriber {{Infobox <persona|entitate territorial administrative|taxon>}} e connectar le articulo in Wikidata. Etiam Le placiamento in le tres categorias es facite per le infobox. In le futuro espero que con modulo e programmacion in Lua, se pote vider un arbo de taxonomia in le infobox de taxones. Directamente con le datos de Wikidata. Con pauco travalio potemos publicar paginas sobre taxones. Un bot pote adder 1 000 000 mini-articulos facile. Usque al presente io ha visto in ca. 90% de articulos un immagine de Wikidata/Wikicommons cuando ha addito le infobox.

Le svedes es molto organizado, nunc le secundo plus grande Wikipedia [1]. Facemos le mesmo con Wikipedia in interlingua?

Statisticas de linguas romanas: d:Wikidata:Statistics/Wikipedia/Type of content/Romance languages. Julius Tominius (discussion) 04:02, 15 januario 2016 (UTC)

Le problema de crear milles de paginas automaticamente es lor mantenentia. Io non es contrari al creation automatic de paginas, quando illos es mantenibile etiam in forma automatic. In addition, le contento del paginas debe esser encyclopedic, e non solmente un cumulo de datos e imagines.
Nos poterea facer un exemplo con un numero parve, per exemplo 5 paginas, e analysar lor qualitate e le difficultates de lor mantenentia. --Julian (disc.) 00:59, 16 januario 2016 (UTC)

1) mantenibile: Infobox es mantenibile. Si tute Wikipedias ha infobox con datos de Wikidata, tunc multe personas vide e pote mantener. Mantenibilitate... hic - quasi un anno, tres patronos non-existente incluido in le articulo. 2) encyclopedic - en:Luolishaniidae es suficiente?

In Wikidata, 2016-01-16, ha

  • 2 133 530 taxones.(claim[31:(tree[16521][][279])] [2])
  • 1 510 175 taxones del regno Animalia (claim[31:(tree[16521][][279])] and claim[171:(tree[729][][171])] [3])
  • 437 517 taxones con un pagina in un del cinque Wikipedia plus grandes (en,de,fr,es,it) (claim[31:(tree[16521][][279])] and link[enwiki,dewiki,frwiki,eswiki,itwiki] [4])
    • 11 244 taxones con un pagina in cata de illos (claim[31:(tree[16521][][279])] and link[enwiki] and link[dewiki] and link[frwiki] and link[eswiki] and link[itwiki] [5])

Potemos comenciar con los 11244. Via PagePile e TABernacle se pote download le nomines del taxones. Julius Tominius (discussion) 08:58, 16 januario 2016 (UTC)

Io propone comenciar con 5 paginas e non con 11244 paginas. Nos pote designar un pagina que ha un contento automaticamente generate sed utile.
Le problema con le articulo de Wikidata que tu monstrava esserea multo pejor si illo esseva replicate milles de vices.
Forsan nos deberea etiquettar le paginas generate automaticamente, usque un editor human los modifica. Per exemplo:
<!-- Iste articulo esseva generate automaticamente. Per favor dele iste linea quando tu face le prime modification. Gratias. -->{{articulo generate automaticamente}}
--Julian (disc.) 13:25, 16 januario 2016 (UTC)

Para entender mejor le quantite del travalio, io ha facite statistica per le rangos basic. Dominio 4 (completo), Regno 11 (completo), Phylo 178 (io illo fa manualmente, faltan ~50). Etiam nunc existe Categoria:Rango taxinomic e un navbar. Un taxon pote haber 0+ rangos. Pro mantenibilitate, io penso le plus bone es haber sectiones, p.e. Nomine (explication de latino/grec), Rango taxinomic, Supertaxones, Subtaxones o algo perecido. E in le primera linea solo que se trata de un taxon. Taxon es un grupo, e existen regrpationes. E.g. le mesmos plantas poten ser describido in differentes taxones. Julius Tominius (discussion) 06:12, 17 januario 2016 (UTC)

Lo mejor para mantebilidate es no haber content proprio. Solo poner in le pagina un de istos:

<!-- Iste articulo es generate via un patrono. -->{{autopagina}}
<!-- Iste articulo es generate via un patrono. -->{{autopagina/typo/taxon}}

Un patrono de istos pote incluir un mensaje visible al lector, con un ligamine a pagina Wikipedia:Autopagina que explica como es facite e pro/perque. Le infos de 2 000 000 taxones e 2 000 000 personas, directamente accesibile e menos ligamines rubie in altere articulos. Es un chance: haber le nomines de paginas e futuros articulos antes de inserer ligamines in texto mesmo. Quando aparece un proprietate nuevo e no es in le patrono, solo necessita cambiar le patrono. Le altere Wiki necessitan un bot que cambia milles de paginas. Pro taxones, alcuns de le altere wikipedias ha paginas grande con molto info, ma etiam alcuns solo parestracen facito una volta e poste nunquam cambiato. Forsan altere Wikipedias pote facer le mesmo e installar autopaginas. Julius Tominius (discussion) 09:11, 18 januario 2016 (UTC)

Il ha duo punctos que io vole clarificar:
Le prime puncto es le thema del creation del articulos. Le articulos create automaticamente deberea esser create per usatores dedicate (un usator de bot). Illo debe sequer, naturalmente, le periodo de probas, un certe limite per paginas per die, e altere passos standard de controlo pro bots.
Le secunde puncto es le thema del mantenentia del articulos. Le idea del patrono {{autopagina}} es bon, sed nos debe solver un problema ancora: que nos face con le articulos modificate per humanos. Per exemplo, Equus ferus caballus (cavallo) habera plus information que altere species minus cognoscite como Dendrogramma enigmatica. In 2 milliones taxones, multe de illos non habera un sol modification, sed alicun de illos habera modificationes. Mi proposition del patrono supra es pro facer le distinction inter le articulo actualisate exclusivemente via patronos, e illos que es etiam modificate per humanos.
--Julian (disc.) 23:14, 20 januario 2016 (UTC)
Re creation: Patrono:Autopagina/typo/taxon e tres exemplos: Pteropodidae, Trachinoidei, (Poste nlwiki iawiki es le secundo de haber un pagina pro:) Dendrogramma enigmatica. Le bot deve inserir {{autopagina/typo/taxon}} e conectar le pagina con un le item in Wikidata. Input "Q<numero> <nomine de pagina>". E solo crear un pagina cuando 1) le item in Wikidata no ha ligamine a iawiki e 2) no existe pagina in <nomine de pagina> 3) Existe exactamente un "P225 Nomine del taxon" e P225 = <nomine de pagina>.
Re mantenentia: Si solo se vole distinguir inter autopagina e human-pagina, un humano pote inserir "subst:", es decir {{subst:autopagina/typo/taxon}} e la pagina no ha plus le patrono:autopagina/typo/taxon, ma ancora le infobox/typo/taxon. Solo haber {{autopagina/typo/taxon}} in le paginas ha le avantage, que es posible controlar tote le contenido. No necessita bot si se vide un error, ma solo cambiar le patrono. Poste de initialisation como pagina normal, no habemos control completo. Ma se pote controlar un pauco con catscan, autolist2.
Io travalio con sparql / query.wikidata.org e quick statments por adder labels. Usque nunc io ha facite ca. 80000. Julius Tominius (discussion) 18:21, 21 januario 2016 (UTC) ... 100 000+. Julius Tominius (discussion) 04:33, 22 januario 2016 (UTC)
In mi opinion le solution es satisfactori. Le articulos create automaticamente ha un patrono specific: {{autopagina}}. In ille modo nos sape que articulos esseva generate per bots. Depost de esser create, le prime editor del articulo es responsabile de scriber le commando "subst:". Illo indica que le articulo essera mantenite per humanos. In omne caso, le reimplaciamento produce un inclusion de un patrono que jam ha datos actualisate de Wikidata, e tunc le humano non necessita adder los.
--Julian (disc.) 01:07, 23 januario 2016 (UTC)
Julian, gratias. Nunc necessita de selectionar articulos a crear. Vide section Articulos con autopagina/typo/taxon Yeti2016 (discussion) 21:24, 24 januario 2016 (UTC)

Articulos con autopagina/typo/taxon[modificar fonte]

Penso que taxones del Categoria:Tetrapoda es le plus interesante para gente a leger. Pro reducir chance de creare fake, seria bien que le item in Wikidata ha un identificator external e almenos duo ligamines a un wikipedia (tres sitelinks, proque a veces existe link al wikispecies). In Tetrapoda ha quatro subcategorias, penso le plus interesante es Mammalia e dopo Aves. Empezamos con istos? Potes programar le bot? Pro obtener un lista <ID item (Q-numero)> <nomine de articulo>: Wikipedia:Taxon#SPARQL, Reptilia no funciona, e no pote filtrar ?count>2. Bisogno etiam adder nomine al item, donde no ha itemLabel, isto se pote facer con quick-statemets. Yeti2016 (discussion) 21:24, 24 januario 2016 (UTC)

Tabula - Resumen e progreso de reorganisation de articulos con infoboxes e Wikidata[modificar fonte]

Wikipedia:Lista de classes de articulos
instantia de Quantitate in Wikidata Quantit. Dato de q. Qt. auto Qt. auto % ia:Patrono:Infobox<...> ia:Categoria:Instantia de <...> Nomine de articulo Solo ASCII? Commento
(total) 15 800 000 19 018 2016-02-01 19 720 100.00000000 - -
(total con classe [sin "-a determinar-"]) - 15122 76.68356998 (/typo) (Categoria:Instantia) No.
n.a. 151 2016-02-20 0 0 /articulo/ -a determinar-
pagina de disambiguation 183 2016-02-20 0 0 (Patrono:Disambiguation) pagina de disambiguation Si.
persona ~2 900 000 850 2016-02-01 1 211 6.14097363 /typo/persona persona No.
entitate territorial administrative ~ 2 000 000 8 873 2016-02-01 9 013 45.70486815 /typo/entitate territorial administrative entitate territorial administrative No.
taxon ~2 000 000 1 006 2016-02-01 1 221 6.19168357 /typo/taxon taxon Nomine scientific international Si. Patrono:autopagina/typo/taxon
languoid 11 871 168 2016-02-02 191 0.96855984 /typo/languoid languoid multe con prefix "Lingua " o "Linguas " Si. (no complete de Wikidata, alcuns articulos ha datos in le infobox)
objecto geographic physic 375 572 91 2016-02-01 234 1.18661258 /typo/objecto geographic physic objecto geographic physic con prefix "Fluvio/Monte/Laco/Insula/Archipelago " Si. Patrono:autopagina/typo/objecto geographic physic
isotopo ~3000+ 3 087 2016-02-01 3 085 15.64401623 /typo/isotopo isotopo Si. Patrono:Autopagina/typo/isotopo, a controlar: antimonio->stibium, tin->stanno, molybdenum->molybdeno
elemento chimic 156 2016-02-01 156 0.79107505 /typo/elemento chimic elemento chimic Si.
anno 122 2016-02-01 0 0 /typo/anno anno Si.
opera musical 11 2016-02-02 11 0.05578093 /typo/opera musical opera musical No.


WikiProjecto Infoboxes[modificar fonte]

Salute!

Io ha create le pagina del WikiProjecto Infoboxes. Per favor, seque le discussion in su pagina pagina de discussion.

Multe gratias! --Julian (disc.) 11:13, 30 januario 2016 (UTC)

Interlingua is missing[modificar fonte]

Interlingua is missing from this page:
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/There_is_also_a_Wikipedia_in_your_language
More than 100 languages are now listed.
Thank you, Varlaam (discussion) 18:02, 30 januario 2016 (UTC)

Gratias. Addito "Interlingua: Existe etiam un Wikipedia in Interlingua: https://ia.wikipedia.org". Aluminium-19s (discussion) 18:19, 30 januario 2016 (UTC)
Thanks very much for your help! Varlaam (discussion) 05:36, 31 januario 2016 (UTC)
Varlaam - Alu19s has just been locked. Certain users are hunting certain other users. Really bad. Would be nice, people would just create content instead. Beryllium-12 (discussion) 03:00, 2 februario 2016 (UTC)
Good Lord.
All of the projects have problems with silly nonsense like this, including enwiki.
Best regards, Varlaam (discussion) 05:32, 4 februario 2016 (UTC)
Varlaam, thanks for your feedback! Encouraging to hear. 91.9.108.75 20:34, 4 februario 2016 (UTC)

Accusar usatores de haber create paginas "automaticamente"[modificar fonte]

"Heri io videva milles de paginas de isotopos create automaticamente." [6]. Recerca: 1) secundo Wikipedia:Lista de classes de articulos nunc existen 1822 (un mille e 822) paginas de isotopes. 2) Hydrogeno-1 create 2016-01-28 15:41, Gadolinium-169 create 2016-01-29 23:30. Tempo 1 dia, 7 horas, 49 minutos. ((1*24+7)*60)+49 = 1909. 1+2) 0.95442640125 articulos per hora. 3) Le maximum parece esser ~8 articulos per minuto. Facile pro humano. Aluminium-19s (discussion) 02:35, 31 januario 2016 (UTC)

Julian - io va a convertir le paginas, almenos unos. Cordialmente Varianligus (discussion) 01:44, 2 februario 2016 (UTC)
Varianligus has been blocked in the middle of his (or her!) work. Very bad, since they temporarily disabled un patrono, and now 1500+ pages are broken. But I am here to help. NO PASARAN! Beryllium-12 (discussion) 02:20, 2 februario 2016 (UTC)
Categoria:Usator blocate - usatores de Wikipedia in interlingua (contributores o conto creato hic), que es blocate global - istos bloces no aparecen in Special:Lista de blocadas. Beryllium-12 (discussion) 03:48, 2 februario 2016 (UTC)

Chassa de Julius Tominius[modificar fonte]

Via meta.wikimedia.org

Message al Presidente de UMI[modificar fonte]


Julian Mendez es administrador de Wikipedia in interlingua.

Por favor sribe un message al Wikimedia Foundation que dejan le contributores de Wikipedia in interlingua in pace.

Como pote esser, que gente que no contribute al Wikipedia in interlingua, pote determinar quien pote contribuar e quien no? Le blocos es gran disruption.


Vamos a ver, si UMI adjuta parlatores de interlingua o no. Viva Usator:Julius Tominius. NO PASARAN! Fluor-14s (discussion) 19:49, 2 februario 2016 (UTC)

Petitiones[modificar fonte]

Petition - lista - appendice[modificar fonte]

Propongo de mover le listas al spatio de nomine Appendice.

In le momento no es pssobile de distinguir inter un articulo, p.e.

e un lista, p.e.

Altere ideas? Americium-231 (discussion) 01:03, 3 februario 2016 (UTC)

Illo me sembla bon: le listas non es articulos.--Julian (disc.) 01:10, 3 februario 2016 (UTC)
Juli, gratias! Bon audir de ti! Argento-101b (discussion) 02:35, 3 februario 2016 (UTC)
Ergo, si il non ha opinion contrari, io renominara le paginas del categoria:instantia de lista e cambiara lor titulos pro pertiner al spatio de nomine Appendice.--Julian (disc.) 20:57, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)

Bone. Forsan mover sin lassar redirect, pro evitar cross-namespace redirects. Ma asi es plus travalio pro ti. Penso que solo un admin pote mover sin lassar redirect. O tu move normal, e altere personas cambian le ligamines, e poste tu eliminas le cross-namespace redirects. Tu decision. 91.9.103.154 22:34, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)

Facite.--Julian (disc.) 21:37, 12 februario 2016 (UTC)
Gratias Juli! Vamos! 91.9.126.32 20:31, 13 februario 2016 (UTC)

Un pagina plus a renominar: Lista de symbolos del codification de characteres in HTML e ASCII. 91.9.126.32 22:13, 13 februario 2016 (UTC)

Le ration es que su structura non es propriemente le structura de un lista, sed de un ensemble de tabulas, que perderea parte de su utilitate si illo esseva monstrate como un lista. In addition, illo esseva originalmente pensate pro adjutar al editores de Wikipedia con le formulas LaTeX, e illo include solmente ille commandos LaTeX que pote esser monstrate per le application MediaWiki. --Julian (disc.) 20:15, 17 februario 2016 (UTC)
Julian, non es consistente con altere paginas e con tu activitates. 1) Existen listas qual es tabulas (p.e. Appendice:Lista de elementos chimic - existe desde 2003). 2) Existevan "listas" qual in realitate continen duo listas (p.e. [7] con interaction de ti). Si un pagina contine plus de un - utilisa le plural: Appendice:Listas de LaTeX symbols / Appendice:Tabulas de LaTeX symbols. 3) Si solo se refere a symbolos "que pote esser monstrate per le application MediaWiki" - monstra isto in le titolo: Appendice:Tabulas de symbolos de LaTeX monstrabile in MediaWiki. 91.9.99.43 23:29, 19 februario 2016 (UTC)

Petition - sidebar[modificar fonte]

  • MediaWiki:Sidebar - remover Portal:Actualitates|Actualitates - ultima modification August 2015.
  • Adder "In altere projectos" con ligamines a Commons, Species, ia-Wikivoyage, ia-Wiktionary. Compare ru:Лев "В других проектах", it:Panthera leo - "Altri projetti". Idealmente mover Wikidata in iste area.
  • Forsan sortear "In altere linguas" - primero tote le linguas romanic. 91.9.123.18 03:46, 4 februario 2016 (UTC)
  • Io actualisava le contento de Portal:Actualitates.
  • Io importava le patrono del Wikipedia in anglese e lo traduceva.
  • Io suggere no cambiar le ordine de altere linguas. Le problema que io vide es definir que linguas vaderea al initio. --Julian (disc.) 01:02, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)
  • Portal:Actualitates - le primer linea del contento es un link a UMI. UMI ne publica le Wikipedia, es solo un organisation pro le lingua interlingua. Le pagina no contine actualitates. Le actualisation es solo un removimento de contenuto. Sufficiente un ligamines del pagina principal, no?
  • Le petition era de adder "Sister project links" al Sidebar como in Wikipedia italian e rusa. Asi aparece in cata pagina, no? Si technicamente no es possible, le loco plus logic es le infobox, proque le infoboxes monstran le contenuto de Wikidata. Etiam pro mantenentia es mejor, proque 75% del paginas ha infobox. https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Interprogetto#Elenco_dei_prefissi_accettati
  • "Le problema que io vide es definir que linguas vaderea al initio": le proposo esseva le linguas romanic al initio. Sin proposo de reorginasar le linguas romanic, isto significa in orden como existe nunc. 91.9.119.34 12:25, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)
Nunc io vide le section Altri progetti al latere. Illo me sembla bon, sed io non sape como es technicamente facite. --Julian (disc.) 21:03, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)
Ah, OK. Gratias! Io tampoco. Vamos vider. 91.9.103.154 22:28, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)

Julian, ahora existe "Altere projectos". 91.9.104.249 19:01, 16 februario 2016 (UTC)

  • Mover "Instrumentos" super "In altere projectos". 91.9.109.141 07:17, 15 martio 2016 (UTC)

Petition - disdeler[modificar fonte]

Le categorias Categoria:Otariidae, Categoria:Procyonidae, Categoria:Mustelidae, Categoria:Viverridae, Categoria:Herpestidae continen articulos. Petition de disdeler. 91.9.103.154 22:40, 9 februario 2016 (UTC)

Facite. --Julian (disc.) 21:58, 12 februario 2016 (UTC)
Julian, gratias. 91.9.108.51 21:57, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)

Le paginas

Petition - renominar[modificar fonte]

Le logica: non adder le parola lingua si le lingua es construite.
Pro que le linguas construite? Pro que illos recipeva un nomine al momento del creation. Per contrasto, le linguas natural usualmente ha recipite le nomine del populos que lo parla originalmente, e tunc le nomine functiona etiam como adjectivo del populo.
Per exemplo, in le pagina de Wikipedia in anglese on pote vide en:Tagalog language (equivalente a Lingua tagalog), sed on vide en:Ido (language) (equivalente a Ido (lingua)). --Julian (disc.) 11:03, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)
Tres logicas
  • Logica 1 "non adder le parola lingua si le lingua es construite"
  • Logica 2 non adder le parola lingua quando le lingua "recipeva un nomine al momento del creation."
  • Logica 3 facer como Wikipedia anglese.
Qual logica(s) applica Julian si existe conflicto inter le tres logicas. 91.9.127.230 21:35, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)

Petition - deler[modificar fonte]

Petition - disproteger[modificar fonte]

Discussion super executiones de bots local[modificar fonte]

Salute!

Il ha un nove spatio pro discuter le execution de bots local: discussion_Wikipedia:bot/local. Ben que le discussiones pote esser in interlingua o in anglese, senti vos libere de participar e peter un traduction si vos non comprende le anglese.

--Julian (disc.) 20:46, 17 februario 2016 (UTC)

Con deletion [12] in le pagina principal pro bots. Logic? E como es decir "gratias" al IP? 91.9.108.185 22:45, 17 februario 2016 (UTC)
Wikipedia:Bot es un pagina principal ubi solmente information general e ligamines es monstrate. Illo non es un pagina de discussion. Io copiava le texto in forma identic in altere pagina que es un pagina de discussion. Pro monstrar le contributor original, io addeva al final le differentia del cambios. Illo se presenta como "original". Io non cognosce technicamente un altere forma pro mover un parte de un pagina a un altere pagina e preservar su autor original. --Julian (disc.) 11:19, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)
"Wikipedia:Bot es un pagina principal ubi solmente information general e ligamines es monstrate." - proque remover sin lassar un ligamine? 91.9.127.230 21:25, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)

Etiam - paginas de dicussion es pro discutir le pagina. Nunc existe Wikipedia:Bot/2016 pro ligamines estabile. 91.9.108.185 23:10, 17 februario 2016 (UTC)

Resultado de copiar sin lassar ligamine es que no funciona le requesta externa: [13] 91.9.108.185 23:16, 17 februario 2016 (UTC)

Discussion super organisation de paginas re bots[modificar fonte]

Io va a fusionar tres paginas que al momento contine le discussion del activitates pro le bots local: Wikipedia:Bot/2016, discussion Wikipedia:bot/local (in le historia), e discussion Wikipedia:bot. Le contento deberea esser in un pagina de discussion. Io pensa que le melior optiones es discussion Wikipedia:bot/local o discussion Wikipedia:bot/local/2016, pro lassar clar le facto que le discussion es exclusive pro execution de bots in Wikipedia in interlingua. Que opina vos? --Julian (disc.) 23:38, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)
Le loco plus logic pro discutar le organisation de paginas re Wikipedia:Bot me parece Discussion Wikipedia:Bot. 91.9.127.230 23:43, 18 februario 2016 (UTC)
Facite. Io moveva le pecias de discussion super le pagina al section infra. --Julian (disc.) 13:41, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)
Non ver. Non facite. "Le loco plus logic pro discutar le organisation de paginas re Wikipedia:Bot me parece Discussion Wikipedia:Bot" - In loco de discutir le organisation in iste loco, tu ha removite discussion de organisation de paginas ab iste loco. Etiam in le discussion habeva opposition al fusion de le tres paginas. 91.9.108.51 20:54, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)

Ligamine corte e stabile pote adjutar
  • pro invitar usatores de altere projectos a currer un bot.
  • pro lassar un referentia in le commento de modification quando le bot modifica
"Wikipedia:Bot/2016" es corte e pote esser stabile. Ligamine stabile al sectiones es possible con sectiones nominate con numero. Ligamine a un activitate: Wikipedia:Bot/2016#0001. 91.9.108.185 02:40, 18 februario 2016 (UTC) original e modification


  1. Qual discussiones? Le petitiones pro activitates es in Wikipedia:Bot/2016 con sectiones numerate. Le logic pro isto esseva presentate. Solo necessita que un usante srcibe "Io lo face" o "No comprendo ...." o "Necessita facer anque ..." directamente in le section del activitate. Qual es le logic de separar inter multiple paginas le description del activitate e discussiones e questiones? 91.9.127.230 23:49, 18 februario 2016 (UTC) original
  2. "por lassar clar le facto que le discussion es exclusive pro execution de bots in Wikipedia in interlingua." Isto es quasi clar proque le dominio es "ia.wikipedia.org". Io non vide porque establecer un altere loco pro rare occasiones in qual un activitate de un bot va esser discute in iawiki que no curre in iawiki. Pote esser un bot que cambia labels in wikidata, ma que plus? 91.9.99.43 21:39, 19 februario 2016 (UTC) original e modification
Il ha bots que curre in multe projectos con le mesme o quasi le mesme algorithmo. Lor operatores lassa requestas in ille projectos, face probas, e attende un autorisation. Iste requestas usualmente nasce de ille operatores.
Per contrasto, le bots local curre requestas specific de un projecto, per exemplo, renominar le inclusion de un patrono in multiple articulos. Iste requestas usualmente nasce de contributores regular in iste projecto. --Julian (disc.) 13:56, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)
Le loco plus logic pro discutar 1) le organisation de paginas re Wikipedia:Bot e 2) le bots in general me parece Discussion Wikipedia:Bot. Pro isto io no responde re lo commento de "13:56, 20 februario 2016". 91.9.108.51 21:10, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)

Petition de 1) terminar cata commentar re le discussion de organisation in le taverna. 2) Haber iste discussion in Discussion Wikipedia:Bot. Logic: Le discussion es specific al tema "Bot" in Wikipedia de interlingua. Le pagina principal pro iste tema es Wikipedia:Bot. Un ligamine de hic a le discussion es sufficiente. 91.9.108.51 20:54, 20 februario 2016 (UTC)

Historia de un articulo[modificar fonte]

Adab hodie appelate Bismaya, sed le historia de articulo si perde? No debe renominar? Adab (disambiguation) desambigua alique? Es multo nebulose per mi! Rad talk 18:56, 22 februario 2016 (UTC)

Le contento del articulos non debe esser delite e copiate, sed renominate. --Julian (disc.) 17:38, 1 martio 2016 (UTC)
Le unica persona que ha delite contenuto in le ultimo dias esseva: Usator:Julian Mendez. [14] 91.9.126.176 02:42, 9 martio 2016 (UTC)

Crosswiki postings[modificar fonte]

Wikimania 2016 Scholarships - Deadline soon![modificar fonte]

Please help translate to your language

A reminder - applications for scholarships for Wikimania 2016 in Esino Lario, Italy, are closing soon! Please get your applications in by January 9th. To apply, visit the page below:

Patrick Earley (WMF) via MediaWiki message delivery (discussion) 01:49, 5 januario 2016 (UTC)

2016 WMF Strategy consultation[modificar fonte]

Please help translate to your language

Hello, all.

The Wikimedia Foundation (WMF) has launched a consultation to help create and prioritize WMF strategy beginning July 2016 and for the 12 to 24 months thereafter. This consultation will be open, on Meta, from 18 January to 26 February, after which the Foundation will also use these ideas to help inform its Annual Plan. (More on our timeline can be found on that Meta page.)

Your input is welcome (and greatly desired) at the Meta discussion, 2016 Strategy/Community consultation.

Apologies for English, where this is posted on a non-English project. We thought it was more important to get the consultation translated as much as possible, and good headway has been made there in some languages. There is still much to do, however! We created m:2016 Strategy/Translations to try to help coordinate what needs translation and what progress is being made. :)

If you have questions, please reach out to me on my talk page or on the strategy consultation's talk page or by email to mdennis@wikimedia.org.

I hope you'll join us! Maggie Dennis via MediaWiki message delivery (discussion) 19:06, 18 januario 2016 (UTC)

VisualEditor News #1—2016[modificar fonte]

Elitre (WMF), 19:21, 26 februario 2016 (UTC)

Wikimania 2016: call for posters, discussions and trainings[modificar fonte]

Hi people,
the calls for posters, discussions and trainings for Wikimania 2016 are officially opened, you can find all the relevant links on the conference wiki:

https://wikimania2016.wikimedia.org/wiki/Submissions

The calls will be closed on March 20.

Posters will be reviewed just to make sure that there aren't things which are too much out of scope. Since we have a whole village we will surely find places to attach them, even if we they will be a lot!

Discussions will be managed by a guiding committee who will work on the wiki to meld all the proposals and suggestions.

Trainings will be reviewed by the programme committee. Please note that we request that each training has at least 3-5 interested attendees in order to be put in the programme.

By the beginning of April we will have a first list of all the accepted proposals.

If you have questions we suggest you to ask them on the discussion pages on wiki, so that everyone will be able to see them (and their answers, of course).

We are looking forward to read your ideas! --Yiyi (discussion) 15:33, 29 februario 2016 (UTC)

Completion suggestor[modificar fonte]

- User:CKoerner (WMF) (talk) 22:09, 7 martio 2016 (UTC)

New Wikipedia Library Accounts Available Now (March 2016)[modificar fonte]

Apologies for writing in English. Please help translate to your language

Hello Wikimedians!

The TWL OWL says sign up today!

The Wikipedia Library is announcing signups today for free, full-access accounts to published research as part of our Publisher Donation Program. You can sign up for access to research materials from:

  • Cambridge University Press - a major publisher of academic journals and e-books in a variety of subject areas. Access includes both Cambridge Journals Online and Cambridge Books. 25 accounts.
  • Alexander Street Academic Video Online - a large academic video collection good for a wide range of subjects, including news programs (such as PBS and BBC), music and theatre, lectures and demonstrations, and documentaries. 25 accounts.
  • Baylor University Press - a publisher of academic e-books primarily in religious studies and the humanities. 50 accounts.
  • Future Science Group - a publisher of medical, biotechnological and scientific research. 30 accounts.
  • Annual Reviews - a publisher of review articles in the biomedical sciences. 100 accounts.
  • Miramar Ship Index - an index to ships and their histories since the early 19th century. 30 accounts.

Non-English

  • Noormags - Farsi-language aggregator of academic and professional journals and magazines. 30 accounts.
  • Kotobna - Arabic-language ebook publishing platform. 20 accounts.

Expansions

  • Gale - aggregator of newspapers, magazines and journals. 50 accounts.
  • Elsevier ScienceDirect - an academic publishing company that publishes medical and scientific literature. 100 accounts.

Many other partnerships with accounts available are listed on our partners page, including Project MUSE, De Gruyter, EBSCO, Newspapers.com and British Newspaper Archive. Do better research and help expand the use of high quality references across Wikipedia projects: sign up today!
--The Wikipedia Library Team 20:30, 17 martio 2016 (UTC)


You can host and coordinate signups for a Wikipedia Library branch in your own language. Please contact Ocaasi (WMF).
This message was delivered via the Global Mass Message tool to The Wikipedia Library Global Delivery List.

Open Call for Individual Engagement Grants[modificar fonte]

IEG barnstar 2.png

Please help translate to your language:

Greetings! The Individual Engagement Grants (IEG) program is accepting proposals until April 12th to fund new tools, research, outreach efforts, and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers. Whether you need a small or large amount of funds (up to $30,000 USD), IEGs can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.

With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 15:47, 31 martio 2016 (UTC)

Server switch 2016[modificar fonte]

The Wikimedia Foundation will be testing its newest data center in Dallas. This will make sure Wikipedia and the other Wikimedia wikis can stay online even after a disaster. To make sure everything is working, the Wikimedia Technology department needs to conduct a planned test. This test will show whether they can reliably switch from one data center to the other. It requires many teams to prepare for the test and to be available to fix any unexpected problems.

They will switch all traffic to the new data center on Tuesday, 19 April.
On Thursday, 21 April, they will switch back to the primary data center.

Unfortunately, because of some limitations in MediaWiki, all editing must stop during those two switches. We apologize for this disruption, and we are working to minimize it in the future.

You will be able to read, but not edit, all wikis for a short period of time.

  • You will not be able to edit for approximately 15 to 30 minutes on Tuesday, 19 April and Thursday, 21 April, starting at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 16:00 CEST, 10:00 EDT, 07:00 PDT).

If you try to edit or save during these times, you will see an error message. We hope that no edits will be lost during these minutes, but we can't guarantee it. If you see the error message, then please wait until everything is back to normal. Then you should be able to save your edit. But, we recommend that you make a copy of your changes first, just in case.

Other effects:

  • Background jobs will be slower and some may be dropped.

Red links might not be updated as quickly as normal. If you create an article that is already linked somewhere else, the link will stay red longer than usual. Some long-running scripts will have to be stopped.

  • There will be a code freeze for the week of 18 April.

No non-essential code deployments will take place.

This test was originally planned to take place on March 22. April 19th and 21st are the new dates. You can read the schedule at wikitech.wikimedia.org. They will post any changes on that schedule. There will be more notifications about this. Please share this information with your community. /User:Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 21:07, 17 april 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia to the Moon[modificar fonte]

Hello! Sorry that this is in English only, but we are using village pump messaging in order to reach as many language communities as possible. Wrong page? Please fix it here.

This is an invitation to all Wikipedians: Wikimedia Deutschland has been given data space to include Wikipedia content in an upcoming mission to the Moon. (No joke!) We have launched a community discussion about how to do that, because we feel that this is for the global community of editors. Please, join the discussion on Meta-Wiki (and translate this invitation to your language community)! Best, Moon team at Wikimedia Deutschland 15:35, 21 april 2016 (UTC)


Wikipedia al Luna

Salute! Pardono que isto es in anglese solmente, sed nos usa le communication in le tavernas (o village pumps) pro attinger tante communitates de linguas como possibile. Pagina errate? Per favor fixa lo hic.

Isto es un invitation pro omne wikipedianos: Wikimedia Deutschland ha recipite spatio de datos pro includer contento de Wikipedia in un veniente mission al Luna. (Illo non es un joco!) Nos ha lanceate un discussion del communitate super como facer lo, proque nos senti que illo es pro le communitate global de editores. Per favor, uni te al discussion in Meta-Wiki (e traduce iste invitation al communitate de tu lingua)! Cordialmente, Equipa del Luna in Wikimedia Deutschland 15:35, 21 april 2016 (UTC)

Traduction:--Julian (disc.) 19:27, 30 april 2016 (UTC)

What a waste of other peoples time. 91.9.107.247 00:33, 1 maio 2016 (UTC)

Appendice:Lista de Wikipedias sin files de media local[modificar fonte]

2016-03-17: iawiki es le 5to del Wikipedias con plus de 10 000 articulos e le 16to del W. con plus de 1000 articulos que non utilisa files de media local. [15] Vide etiam: Appendice:Lista de Wikipedias sin files de media local. 91.9.98.208 13:17, 17 martio 2016 (UTC)

JavaScript[modificar fonte]

Hi. I can see that this project has old JavaScript that needs to be updated. I would happily make the required updates myself, but I would have to – at least temporarily – become an admin here to do that (because the relevant pages are in the MediaWiki namespace). I have already made these updates on a number of other projects, so it would be very easy for me to do this. If no one does anything, some JavaScript-related tools will break later this year. If you want me to make these updates, you can grant me admin rights and I will make the updates as soon as I can. Nirmos (discussion) 05:23, 3 junio 2016 (UTC)
Nirmos, please see Discussion Wikipedia:MediaWiki. 91.9.100.204 09:32, 3 junio 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia to the Moon: voting has begun[modificar fonte]

Hello, after six weeks of community discussion about Wikipedia to the Moon, there are now 10 different proposals for content for the mission. Starting today, you can vote for them on Meta-Wiki, and decide what we will work on: a Wikipedia canon, different lists, the Moon in 300 languages, an astronomy editathon, featured articles, articles about technology, endangered things, or DNA-related topics. You can even vote against community involvement. Voting is open until 24 June. Sorry that this message is again in English only, but we are using village pumps to reach as many communities as possible, so that everyone knows they can vote. Best, Moon team at Wikimedia Deutschland 15:31, 10 junio 2016 (UTC)

Contravandalismo, junio 2016[modificar fonte]

Io crede que le vandalismo de que io esseva notificate es multo plus expansive que me pareva a prime vista. Su reparation require plus labor que un sol persona pote facer. Alcun "quefaceres" pro reparar le wiki:

  • Vigila paginas nove cuje sol contento esse un patrono o un patrono plus un sol phrase basic. Un notation que un pagina ha un inscription in le projecto Wikidata non esse un pagina wikipedic.
    • Le botes que crea paginas nove con patronos wikidata assatis usa nomines latin, despecto si ha un nomine commun in interlingua. Si esse necessari, renomina le pagina a su nomine interlinguistic.
  • Vigila renominationes que destrue le pagina del nomine proprie. Per exemplo, James Cook esseva renominate a James Cook (1728) e le nomine normal redirigeva a James Cook (disambiguation). Un pagina regular nunquam debe esser un ligamine a su disambiguation.
  • Vigila renominationes que include le division politic como nomine proprie. Per exemplo, le pagina correcte 'Zacatecas' esseva renominate a 'Stato Zacatecas'. Tote le renominationes de iste typo ha que esser revertite.
    • Nota que le typo del division politic pote esser usate si ha ambiguitate. Per exemplo: si il habeva un usage plus commun que le stato pro 'Zacatecas', le pagina de Zacatecas pote esser nominate 'Zacatecas (stato)'. Si il habeva duo statos nominate Zacatecas, on pote scriber 'Zacatecas (stato mexican)' e 'Zacatecas (stato italian)'.
  • Vigila renominationes que destrue le differentiator o ration de notabilitate. Repeter le exemplo previe: non esseva notabile que James Cook esseva nascite in 1728, esseva notabile que il esseva explorator.
  • Vigila cambios que adde le patrono Infobox. Il ha duo rationes: (1) su usage per botes que automaticamente eliminar contento e reimplaciarlo con iste patrono; e (2) botes que ha create paginas que ha iste patrono como su sol contento. Specialmente, nota que iste botes crea su proprie categorias, nominate "Instantia de..." Pro ora, si esse apparente que le patrono infobox esse erronee, removelo. Si le sol contento in un pagina esse le patrono, specialmente un infobox, reimplacia lo con contento in formato wikipedic. (Tres-cinque phrases non esse difficile)
  • Vigila modificationes recente pro cambios ex le IP 91.9.x.x - il appare que le vandalista usa adresses dynamic illac pro celar su actiones e disfacilitar su reparos.

Nos habe que crear multo pro recrear lo que esseva destruite, ma io crede que le wiki essera melior postea. Gratias pro vostre assistentia. Almafeta (discussion) 06:51, 13 junio 2016 (UTC)

Categorias de mantenentia[modificar fonte]

Gratias, Almafeta.

Il ha altere disruptiones. Le vandalo ha systmaticamente dismantellate le mechanismo de categorias de mantenentia. Durante le menses recente, il ha semblate que le summario de edition "(Infobox/typo/articulo)" semper signalisava non solmente le addition del patrono del infobox sed etiam le remotion de un patrono de mantenentia tal como "{{pecietta | xxx }}" o "{{revision}}" o "{{wikificar}}" o "{{dictionario}}". Assi le categorias ha essite artificialmente vacuate. P.ex. quando "{{pecietta | biographia}}" esseva removite, nulle texto esseva addite al articulo; illo remaneva un pecietta. Quando le categorias esseva vacuate, illos esseva delite.

Io ha recreate alicunes del categorias de peciettas—biographia, arte, biologia, medicina, physica, historia—sed non totes, e pro lor repopulation, multo laboro essera necessari.

Tortoise0308 (discussion) 13:13, 13 junio 2016 (UTC)

Io lo videva. Desfortunatemente, il non ha un methodo de reversion rapide facile. Quando le historia del paginas non esseva delite per renominationes, nos pote usar iste pro reparar le pagina. E gratias pro tu expansion del categorias de peciettas - es bon vider patronos de mantenentia plus specific.
(In le futuro, si il appare que il ha un vandalista rampante, nos invia un e-mail! O notifica meta:Vandalism reports; illes vero ha le poter que combatter vandalismo - plus poter que le administratores! - e illes pote notificar administratores hic per altere methodos si requirite.) Almafeta (discussion) 21:31, 13 junio 2016 (UTC)
Deo, qui velle vandalisar omne patrono de mantentia? Almafeta (discussion) 21:41, 13 junio 2016 (UTC)

Nunc etiam existe Categoria:Peciettas de litteratura. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 22:09, 18 junio 2016 (UTC)

Assi, Categoria:Peciettas de informatica. Almafeta (discussion) 00:12, 19 junio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de politica. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 05:54, 21 junio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de religion. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 12:46, 21 junio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de philosophia. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 04:42, 23 junio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de chimia. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 09:16, 23 junio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de mathematica Tortoise0308 (discussion) 09:25, 5 julio 2016 (UTC)

E Categoria:Peciettas de psychologia Tortoise0308 (discussion) 09:32, 26 julio 2016 (UTC)

Regula "Micropecietta"[modificar fonte]

Io essayate crear un pagina super le scriptor Heinrich von Kleist, ma le creation es prohibite per un regula Micropecietta. Que dice iste regula? Es illo un minimo de longitude del articulo? Si illo es, que es le minimo? FritzVonHomburg (discussion) 07:51, 14 junio 2016 (UTC)

Non es longitude simple; le regula exclude contento non encyclopedic (patronos, ligamines externe e citationes, categorias, etc) como artefactos del formato mediawiki, e sol mesura phrases. (Si non, botes pote crear articulos con miles de characteres de ligamines spam pro parer longe.) Io videva le registro, e notava que le articulo habeva plure listas - io crede (ma non so secur) que le filtro anti-abuso non mesura listas. Pardono! Adde un phrases (forsan un explication de su notabilitate, su operas plus famose, titulos o premios, et cetera) e me pare que esser un pecietta bon. Almafeta (discussion) 06:49, 15 junio 2016 (UTC)
Poterea on restringer le regula a articulos e permitter breve paginas de discussion? Io essayava adder simplemente:
{{infocassa initia}}
{{IC 1000}}
{{IC 30K}}
{{infocassa fini}}
a Discussion:Ecclesia Catholic, e le regula non lo permitterea. Tortoise0308 (discussion) 09:55, 15 junio 2016 (UTC)
Io corrigeva mi error, gratias. Almafeta (discussion) 20:55, 15 junio 2016 (UTC)

Idea: Collaboration del die[modificar fonte]

In addition al "Articulo Eminente" del mense, io propone que nos pote haber un "Collaberation del die:" un lista cyclic de paginas que debe esser meliorate.

  • Iste collaboration essera locate in le pagina principal del wiki (ubi ora es le Imagine Eminente).
  • Le spatio del collaboration cambiara cata die (como le spatio del articulos eminente cambia cata mense).
  • Le spatio del collaboration etiam habera referentias al adjuta (como scriber referentias, como adder imagines de Commons, et cetera).
  • Como initio, le articulos pro collaboration del die essera un del Wikipedia:Articulos vital, e altere articulos de interesse interlinguistic.
  • Cata vece que un articulo pro collaboration esse facite eminente, nos celebra per reimplaciar su entrata in le lista de collaberationes con un nove articulo del lista expandite de articulos vital (anglese), o un articulo proponite per le communitate.

Que pensa vos? Almafeta (discussion) 00:49, 19 junio 2016 (UTC)

Listas mantenite per ListeriaBot[modificar fonte]

Nonobstante ulle bots que nostre IP infatigabile haberea empleate pro su modificationes massive, il ha un bot Usator:ListeriaBot que frequentemente actualisa varie paginas que le IP (o Usator:Bernd Muller) ha create: 2016-nn, Appendice:Lista de xxx. Io non pote trovar un requesta pro iste bot in Wikipedia:Bot. Es iste un problema? Alicunes del listas sembla possibilemente utile. Sed deberea nos insister super observantia del formalitates?

Me pare que ListeriaBot seque le entratas in Wikidata; sia correcte sia traducite. E Bernd Muller / Tobias Conradi vandalisava a Wikidata, etiam... Almafeta (discussion) 07:28, 20 junio 2016 (UTC)

Compact Links coming soon to this wiki[modificar fonte]

Please help translate to your language

Screenshot of Compact Language Links interlanguage list

Hello, I wanted to give a heads up about an upcoming feature for this wiki which you may seen already in the Tech News. Compact Language Links has been available as a beta-feature on all Wikimedia wikis since 2014. With compact language links enabled, users are shown a much shorter list of languages on the interlanguage link section of an article (see image). This will be enabled as a feature in the soon for all users, which can be turned on or off using a preference setting. We look forward to your feedback and please do let us know if you have any questions. Details about Compact Language Links can be read in the project documentation.

Due to the large scale enablement of this feature, we have had to use MassMessage for this announcement and as a result it is only written in English. We will really appreciate if this message can be translated for other users of this wiki. The main announcement can also be translated on this page. Thank you. On behalf of the Wikimedia Language team: Runa Bhattacharjee (WMF) (talk)-13:06, 29 junio 2016 (UTC)

Compact Language Links enabled in this wiki today[modificar fonte]

Please help translate to your language

Screenshot of Compact Language Links interlanguage list

Compact Language Links has been available as a beta-feature on all Wikimedia wikis since 2014. With compact language links enabled, users are shown a much shorter list of languages on the interlanguage link section of an article (see image). Based on several factors, this shorter list of languages is expected to be more relevant for them and valuable for finding similar content in a language known to them. More information about compact language links can be found in the documentation.

From today onwards, compact language links has been enabled as the default listing of interlanguage links on this wiki. However, using the button at the bottom, you will be able to see a longer list of all the languages the article has been written in. The setting for this compact list can be changed by using the checkbox under User Preferences -> Appearance -> Languages

The compact language links feature has been tested extensively by the Wikimedia Language team, which developed it. However, in case there are any problems or other feedback please let us know on the project talk page. It is to be noted that on some wikis the presence of an existing older gadget that was used for a similar purpose may cause an interference for compact language list. We would like to bring this to the attention of the admins of this wiki. Full details are on this phabricator ticket (in English).

Due to the large scale enablement of this feature, we have had to use MassMessage for this announcement and as a result it is only written in English. We will really appreciate if this message can be translated for other users of this wiki. Thank you. On behalf of the Wikimedia Language team: Runa Bhattacharjee (WMF) (talk)-03:05, 1 julio 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia to the Moon: invitation to edit[modificar fonte]

Three weeks ago, you were invited to vote on how to take Wikipedia articles to the Moon. Community voting is over and the winning idea is to send all ‘’featured articles and lists’’ to the Moon. This decision means that, starting today, Wikipedians from all language communities are warmly invited to intensively work on their best articles and lists, and submit them to Wikipedia to the Moon. The central site to coordinate between communities will be Meta-Wiki. You will find an overview and more information there. Hopefully, we will be able to represent as many languages as possible, to show Wikipedia’s diversity. Please feel kindly invited to edit on behalf of your community and tell us about your work on featured content!

Best, Moon team at Wikimedia Deutschland 14:10, 1 julio 2016 (UTC)

Editing News #2—2016[modificar fonte]

m:User:Elitre (WMF), 17:20, 3 julio 2016 (UTC)

Open call for Project Grants[modificar fonte]

IEG barnstar 2.png

Please help translate to your language:

Greetings! The Project Grants program is accepting proposals from July 1st to August 2nd to fund new tools, research, offline outreach (including editathon series, workshops, etc), online organizing (including contests), and other experiments that enhance the work of Wikimedia volunteers.
Whether you need a small or large amount of funds, Project Grants can support you and your team’s project development time in addition to project expenses such as materials, travel, and rental space.
Also accepting candidates to join the Project Grants Committee through July 15.
With thanks, I JethroBT (WMF) 15:25, 5 julio 2016 (UTC)