Wikipedia:Taverna

Taverna

Benvenite al Taverna! Hic tu pote lassar messages al communitate de Wikipedia in interlingua.     , al fin de iste pagina.     Requestas de bots.     Activitates proponite in le Taverna.     Notificationes global in anglese (traduction).     Archivos del Taverna: 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005     Per favor, non alimenta le trolls. English Welcome to the Tavern of Interlingua Wikipedia! Our Tavern is equivalent to the Village Pump on the English Wikipedia. Please add your comments at the end of this page, on a new section. To make bot requests, go to Wikipedia:Bot/requestas, and follow the instructions. Feel free to leave your message in English if you cannot write in Interlingua. Your message could be responded in Interlingua. If you don't understand Interlingua, please tell us. Thank you and enjoy Interlingua!

Pro un melior uso de interlingua

Bon anno nove a totes. Io desidera facer duo suggerentias que pote contribuer multo a meliorar le qualitate linguistic del articulos: In prime loco, que nos face uso de un corrector orthographic al minus usque acquirer un certe grado de correctessa in nostre uso de interlingua. Isto es multo utile in discoperir parolas que nos pare interlingua ma es in facto parolas de nostre linguas materne e non le parolas correcte in interlingua. Isto evitara le necessitate de correction posterior. Altere puncto, nonobstante un pauc plus difficile, es recordar que in interlingua, como in multe linguas romanic e a distinction del linguas como le anglese, le adjectivos frequentemente ha un altere forma del substantivos, le duo non es equal. Totevia on non pote scriber duo substantivos conjuncte. Clwb (discussion) 22:31, 5 januario 2014 (UTC)

Ben pensate. (Io cognosce mi proprie problemas in ille cosa -- que io scribe interlingua portante "beryllos francese" con le resultante errores in mi vocabulario e grammatica.) Mekanurg (discussion) 08:16, 7 januario 2014 (UTC)

Illo me sembla un excellente idea. --Julian (disc.) 21:24, 7 januario 2014 (UTC)

Melioration de Decembre, scopos pro Januario

Secun meta, nos ganiava un rango in Decembre; ora nos esse le novantesime (90me) plus complete wikipedia. Multo ben!

Pro le mense de Januario, meta ha identificate iste dece articulos pro crear e meliorar: phonema, Louis XIV de Francia, Mao Zedong, serpente, fascismo, Mesopotamia, suicidio, Cairo, lingua chinese (que ora esse redirigite a lingua chinese mandarin), e corde.

Il ha plus que nos pote facer pro meliorar articulos que traducer articulos monstruose. Scribe explicationes, crea citationes, adde imagines eminente de Commons, o plena su ligamines rubie.

Nos sol ha que ganiar 0.12% pro ganiar un nove rango iste mense. Io me fide que nos pote facer iste! Almafeta (discussion) 18:38, 7 januario 2014 (UTC)

Question a totes: Es le scopo de "ganiar un rango cata mense" bastante practicabile - ni troppo ambitiose, ni multo facile? Almafeta (discussion) 18:55, 7 januario 2014 (UTC)

Aquelle, aquello, fin a, depois...

Io volerea saper vostre opinion sur alcun formas optional de certe parolas e tamben sur alcunos del terminos introducite per Stanley Mulayk ("mulaykismos"), concrete- e specialmente sur formas como "aquelle, "aquello", "fin a" (usque), "depois-depost", "sur-super". Esque vos pensa que tote iste formas son adequate e pote ser usate liberemente? Io non gusta apartar me del conventiones official, ma sovente io dubita si serea melior utilisar alcun de iste formas. Per exemplo, in principio io non gusta troppo le formas "aquelle", "aquello", ma le argumentationes de Stanley Mulayk in defensa de iste terminos sembla a me logic e, in plus, un texto scribite con iste formas sembla plus comprensibile pro un majoritate de lectores de linguas romanic. Concernente "fin a", iste forma tamben non gusta multo a me, ma io tamben non gusta le forma "usque", proque multe poc personas pote comprender lo e a me sona troppo latinesc. Altere parolas de origine directemente latin que necuno pote intender, como "parve", o que sembla non ser correctemente eligite, como "moneta" o "chassa", io los cambia per "petite" (ben que iste parola non appare in le dictionarios de interlingua, io es secur que illo es multo melior comprendite que "parve" e que dunque serea correcte adoptar officialmente le forma "petite"), "denero" o "cacia". Io tamben prefere usar "ser" in vece "esser" e dubita multo si es melior utilisar "sur" o "super". PeioR (discussion) 19:59, 12 januario 2014 (UTC)

"Moneta" corresponde a "money" (angl), "monnaie" (fra), "moneda" (esp), dunque ille parola conforma al "regula de tres" classic. Mekanurg (discussion) 13:29, 20 januario 2014 (UTC)

Ma interlingua usa le parola "moneta" pro referer se tanto a illo que in anglese on dice "money" como a lo que in iste mesme lingua es "coin". Tamen, le linguas fonte face un clar differentia: "money-coin" (ang); "argent-monnaie" (fr); "denaro-moneta" (it); dinero-moneda" (esp). E in latino nos ha le parola "denarĭus". Io non sape proque interlingua non face le mesme dintinction que tote le linguas fonte. In mi opinion, interlingua es un lingua multo ben construite, ma illo ha tamben parve ("petite"?) errores que on debe resolver. Io pensa que le optime solution in iste caso serea adoptar officialmente le forma "denero", a medie cammino inter "denaro" e "dinero". PeioR (discussion) 9:49, 21 januario 2014 (UTC)

Si on acceptarea tu proposition, le prototypo serea "denario" proque ille forma conforma etymologicamente con le regulas del interlingua pro le introduction de nove parolas. Mekanurg (discussion) 10:13, 21 januario 2014 (UTC)

Le prototypo secundo le ideas del interlingua pro le trio "être" (fra), "ser" (esp) e "essere" (ita) es "esser". (Le forma "ser" es dunque un caso de hispanicismo.) In le mesme maniera, on vide que le protoypo etymologic pro "sur" (fra), "sobre" (esp) e "su" (ita) es "super". Mekanurg (discussion) 08:20, 21 januario 2014 (UTC)

Request for comment on Commons: Should Wikimedia support MP4 video?

I apologize for this message being only in English. Please translate it if needed to help your community.

The Wikimedia Foundation's multimedia team seeks community guidance on a proposal to support the MP4 video format. This digital video standard is used widely around the world to record, edit and watch videos on mobile phones, desktop computers and home video devices. It is also known as H.264/MPEG-4 or AVC.

Supporting the MP4 format would make it much easier for our users to view and contribute video on Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects -- and video files could be offered in dual formats on our sites, so we could continue to support current open formats (WebM and Ogg Theora).

However, MP4 is a patent-encumbered format, and using a proprietary format would be a departure from our current practice of only supporting open formats on our sites -- even though the licenses appear to have acceptable legal terms, with only a small fee required.

We would appreciate your guidance on whether or not to support MP4. Our Request for Comments presents views both in favor and against MP4 support, based on opinions we’ve heard in our discussions with community and team members.

Please join this RfC -- and share your advice.

All users are welcome to participate, whether you are active on Commons, Wikipedia, other Wikimedia project -- or any site that uses content from our free media repository.

You are also welcome to join tomorrow's Office hours chat on IRC, this Thursday, January 16, at 19:00 UTC, if you would like to discuss this project with our team and other community members.

We look forward to a constructive discussion with you, so we can make a more informed decision together on this important topic. Keegan (WMF) (talk) 06:47, 16 januario 2014 (UTC)

Universal Language Selector will be enabled by default again on this wiki by 21 February 2014

On January 21 2014 the MediaWiki extension Universal Language Selector (ULS) was disabled on this wiki. A new preference was added for logged-in users to turn on ULS. This was done to prevent slow loading of pages due to ULS webfonts, a behaviour that had been observed by the Wikimedia Technical Operations team on some wikis.

We are now ready to enable ULS again. The temporary preference to enable ULS will be removed. A new checkbox has been added to the Language Panel to enable/disable font delivery. This will be unchecked by default for this wiki, but can be selected at any time by the users to enable webfonts. This is an interim solution while we improve the feature of webfonts delivery.

You can read the announcement and the development plan for more information. Apologies for writing this message only in English. Thank you. Runa

Amendment to the Terms of Use

Hello all,

Please join a discussion about a proposed amendment to the Wikimedia Terms of Use regarding undisclosed paid editing and we encourage you to voice your thoughts there. Please translate this statement if you can, and we welcome you to translate the proposed amendment and introduction. Please see the discussion on Meta Wiki for more information. Thank you! Slaporte (WMF) 22:00, 21 februario 2014 (UTC)

Call for project ideas: funding is available for community experiments

I apologize if this message is not in your language. Please help translate it.

Do you have an idea for a project that could improve your community? Individual Engagement Grants from the Wikimedia Foundation help support individuals and small teams to organize experiments for 6 months. You can get funding to try out your idea for online community organizing, outreach, tool-building, or research to help make Wikipedia better. In March, we’re looking for new project proposals.

Examples of past Individual Engagement Grant projects:

• Organizing social media for Chinese Wikipedia ($350 for materials)
• Improving gadgets for Visual Editor ($4500 for developers)
• Coordinating access to reliable sources for Wikipedians ($7500 for project management, consultants and materials)
• Building community and strategy for Wikisource (€10000 for organizing and travel)

Proposals are due by 31 March 2014. There are a number of ways to get involved!

Hope to have your participation,

--Siko Bouterse, Head of Individual Engagement Grants, Wikimedia Foundation 19:44, 28 februario 2014 (UTC)