Reporto Rind
Le Reporto Rind es un studio scientific publicate in 1998 in le Psychological Bulletin del Association American de Psychiatria per le psychologos Bruce Rind, Philip Tromovitch e Robert Bauserman, con le titulo in anglese A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of childsexual abuse using college samples [Metanalyse del consequentias del abuso sexual infantil, a partir de casos non clinic]. Le scopo del recerca esseva establir, considerante le credentias basic del societate super le supponite consequentias negative del activitate sexual super le infantes, si le monstras analysate per le autores habeva essite realmente damnate per iste experientia. Le resultatos indica que circa 70% del monstras investigate considera que lor experientias sexual con adultos durante le infantia o adolescentia ha essite positive o non ha habite consequentias.[1]
Le studio ha essite scopo de un grande polemica in le Statos Unite a partir del criticas de alcun conservatores social e fundamentalistas religiose, e anque de alcun psychiatros e psychotherapeutas. Le Congresso del Statos Unite ha manifestate su preoccupation quanto al consequentias que poterea haber le publication del resultatos del studio super le paradigmas official respecto al pedophilia e in 12 de julio de 1999 illo lo ha denunciate e condemnate in modo quasi unanime.[2] Le condemnation de un studio scientific de parte del congresso ha essite in ille momento un facto sin precedentes.[3]
Contento |
[modificar] Terminologia utilisate
Le autores del studio considera inadequate le utilisation del expression "abuso sexual infantil" utilisate in le obras de psychologia pro definir tote le interactiones sexual que pote haber loco inter infantes o adolescentes e personas de etate significativemente plus grande, pois que, secundo illes explica, qualcunque de iste relationes, malgrado non esser legal o acceptate socialmente, poterea esser consentite e ergo non abusive. Nonobstante, illes justifica le utilisation del expression "abuso sexual infantil" (ASI) in su studio proque illo es le mesme que ha utilisate previemente le autores del travalios revisate.[4]
[modificar] Scopo
Le autores analysa e compara le resultatos de un ensemble de 59 studios realisate con monstras non clinic de ambe sexos que ha habite relationes sexual con adultos durante lor infantia, con le scopo de establir, considerante le credentias basic del societate super le supponite consequentias negative del activitate sexual super infantes, si illos ha essite realmente damnate pro iste experientia.
Le quatro suppositiones habitual que le autores considera es:
- Le abuso sexual infantil (ASI) causa un damno psychologic,
- Iste damno es generalisate,
- Iste damno es intense, e
- Le experientia del ASI es equivalente in pueros e pueras.
[modificar] Resultatos
Le studio indica que circa 70% del monstras investigate considera que lor experientias sexual con adultos durante le infantia o adolescentia ha essite positive o non ha habite consequentias. Le autores relativisa e attribue a altere causas, como le medio familiar, le consequentias negative referite per le resto e illes conclude que le credentias del societate super le hypothetic consequentias negative del sexo super infantes e adolescentes "es exagerate e non se sustene".[5] Illes considera, equalmente, que "iste exaggeration face parte de un nove forma de pensar in blanc e nigre, ubi le gris non ha loco [e que] iste pensamento, a su vice, ha le poter de generar reactiones hysteric que se ha multiplicate desde le annos octanta".[6]
[modificar] Reactiones
Le studio ha essite objecto de un grande polemica in le Statos Unite, que ha comenciate con le criticas de alcun conservatores social e fundamentalistas religiose, e anque de alcun psychiatras e psychotherapeutas. Le prime reaction public significative ha essite su origine in le Association National de Recerca e Therapia del Homosexualitate, un organisation consacracte a defender que le homosexualitate es un infermitate mental que on pote curar con psychotherapia. Posteriormente, la presentator conservator de television Laura Schlessenger ha attacate le studio in su programma The Dr. Laura show,[7] dante loco a un campania mediatic que se ha extendite al circulos politic.
Le Congresso del Statos Unite ha manifestate su preoccupation quanto al consequentias que poterea haber le publication del resultatos del studio super le paradigmas official actual respecto al pedophilia e in 12 de julio 1999 illo lo ha denunciate e condemnate in forma quasi unanime, per 355 votos a favor, nulle in contra e 13 abstentiones.[2] Le condemnation de un studio scientific de parte del congresso ha essite in ille momento un facto sin precedentes.[3]
Pressionate proque illo se justificava, le Association American de Psychiatria ha submettite le metanalyse a un nove rondo de revision per pares e a un studio statistic professional, que ha portate al conclusion que le methodologia del studo esseva correcte.[8]
Tamen, on ha continuate a publicar communicatos de pressa e refutationes que appunctava superficialmente a diverse rationes secun le quales le studio deberea esser refusate.[9] Le autor, inter alteres, ha contestate iste refutationes. A causa del pression externe derivate de iste investigation, le doctor Rind ha declarate que ille non poteva continuar con su investigationes pendente super iste thema e que ille cercarea altere objectos de recerca.
In 2001 on ha publicate un serie de articulos que poneva in dubita le resultatos del studio,[10] signalava suponite errores in le metodologia usate e le generalisationes proponite, e affirmava que le resultatos del studio esseva scientificamente invalides.[11][12] Le criticas ha essite publicate in 2001 in le libro Misinformation concerning child sexual abuse and adult survivors [Disinformation super le abuso sexual infantil e le adultos qui ha supervivite].[13]
Le studio ha essite citate sovente como referentia per le movimento activista pedophile[14] e per alcun advocatos pro defender su clientes in judicios super casos de supponite abusos sexual.[15]
[modificar] Referentias
- ↑ Archivos relacionate con le methanalyse de Rind et al., in le sito del IPCE.
- ↑ 2,0 2,1 Whereas no segment of our society is more critical to the future of human survival than our children (1999). 106th Congress, Resolution 107, Congresso del Statos Unite. (in anglese)
- ↑ 3,0 3,1 Rind, Bruce. 163-193 Advances in social & organizational psychology: a tribute to Ralph Rosnow. In: "Meta Analysis, Moral Panic, Congressional Condemnation, and Science: A Personal Journey", p. 163-193. New York: Taylor & Francis/Psychology Press, 2006. ISBN 0-8058-5590-4. (in anglese)
- ↑ Introduction. A meta-analytic examination of assumed properties of childsexual abuse using college samples. IPCE. (in anglese)
- ↑ Rind, B.; Tromovitch, Ph.; Bauserman, R. «A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples». Psychological Bulletin, Vol. CXXIV, nr. 1 (1998), pp. 22-53.
- ↑ Conclusion. IPCE. (in francese)
- ↑ Schlessenger, L. The Dr. Laura show. (23-3-1999)
- ↑ Fowler, Raymond D. RE: APA statements. Child Maltreatment Researchers (Mailing List). (in anglese)
- ↑ Ulrich, Heather M.; Randolph, Mickey; Acheson, Shawn. "Child Sexual Abuse: A Replication of the Meta-analytic Examination of Child Sexual Abuse by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman (1998)". The Scientific Review of Mental Health Practice: objective investigations of controversial and unorthodox claims in clinical psychology, psychiatry and social work (SRMHP), vol. 4, núm. 2. ISSN 1538-4985. (in anglese)
- ↑ Dallam, SJ (2001). "Science or Propaganda? An Examination of Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 9 (3/4): 109–134. Haworth Press. doi:.
- Publicate como capitulo de libro in Dallam SJ (2001). "Science or Propaganda? An Examination of Rind, Tromovitch and Bauserman", in Whitfield CL; Silberg JL; Fink PJ: Misinformation concerning child sexual abuse and adult survivors. Routledge, 109–134. ISBN 0789019019.
- ↑ Tice, PP; Whittenburg JA, Baker G, Lemmey DE. (2000). "The real controversy about child sexual abuse research: Contradictory findings and critical issues not addressed by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman in their 1998 outcomes meta-analysis". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 9 (3–4): 157–82. Haworth Press. doi:. PMID 17521995.
- Publicate como capitulo de libro in Tice, PP; Whittenburg JA; Baker G; Lemmey DE (2001). "The real controversy about child sexual abuse research: Contradictory findings and critical issues not addressed by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman in their 1998 outcomes meta-analysis", in Whitfield CL; Silberg JL; Fink PJ: Misinformation concerning child sexual abuse and adult survivors. Routledge, 157–182. ISBN 0789019019.
- ↑ Whittenburg, JA; Tice PP; Baker G; Lemmey DE (2000). "A critical appraisal of the 1998 meta-analytic review of child sexual abuse outcomes reported by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman". Journal of Child Sexual Abuse 9 (3–4): 135–55. Haworth Press. doi:. PMID 17521994.
- Publicate como capitulo de libro in Whittenburg, JA; Tice PP; Baker G; Lemmey DE (2001). "A critical appraisal of the 1998 meta-analytic review of child sexual abuse outcomes reported by Rind, Tromovitch, and Bauserman", in Whitfield CL; Silberg JL; Fink PJ: Misinformation concerning child sexual abuse and adult survivors. Routledge, 135–156. ISBN 0789019019.
- ↑ Whitfield, CL; Silberg JL; Fink PJ (2001). Misinformation concerning child sexual abuse and adult survivors. Routledge. ISBN 0789019019.
- ↑ The Good News About Man/Boy Love. IPCE. (in anglese)
- ↑ Spiegel, J.. Sexual Abuse of Males: The Sam Model of Theory and Practice. Routledge, 2003. ISBN 1-56032-403-1. (in anglese)
[modificar] Ligamines externe
- RIND, B., Tromovitch, Ph., Bauserman, R. "A Meta-Analytic Examination of Assumed Properties of Child Sexual Abuse Using College Samples". IPCE Library. (anglese)
